|    
                          1) General 
                        The primary function of a 
                          scrubber is to contact chlorine with a scrubbing fluid. 
                          Chlorine scrubbing systems have been installed to abate 
                          a wide range of process streams. Depending on the size 
                          and on the main objective of the scrubber, there are 
                          various options to select from when basic design choices 
                          are made. Examples of streams being scrubbed are continuous 
                          process vents, system emergency relief, and vents from 
                          rooms storing chlorine containing vessels. The selection 
                          of a continuous system over a batch or emergency unit 
                          will impact the method used for transporting the fluids 
                          and the method for bringing them in contact. Each type 
                          of vent poses different demands on equipment. For emergency 
                          chlorine spill control the conservative design system 
                          would assume the chlorine to be wet. A review of the 
                          location for the scrubbing system should consider the 
                          safety of adjacent areas. 
                        The use of redundant instrumentation, 
                          increased safety factors in the design, and stand-by 
                          electrical power supply should be considered. Reliability 
                          takes precedence over economics. Below sections 2) through 
                          8) give guidance to the designer relative to the selection 
                          of system components. 
                        2) Materials of Construction 
                        In the selection process 
                          for the materials to be used, the engineer must consider 
                          the operating parameters in which the scrubbing system 
                          will be expected to perform not only under normal process 
                          conditions but also during process upsets. Different 
                          concentrations and temperatures of hypochlorite and 
                          caustic can affect the corrosiveness of these solutions. 
                          Therefore, the particular conditions will impart the 
                          selection of the appropriate materials of construction. 
                          Each installation may have a different application which 
                          must be studied to obtain a safe, economic, and efficient 
                          system. The use of improper materials of construction 
                          can lead to premature failure of piping and/or the scrubber. 
                        As reference and without 
                          the intention to exclude others, a common set of conditions 
                          found in the operation of a scrubber system show the 
                          demanding environment in which the materials must perform. 
                          These conditions are: 
                        
                           
                            |   Component  | 
                              Concentration  | 
                              Temperature  | 
                           
                           
                            |   Wet 
                                chlorine gas  | 
                              50 
                                to 99 %  | 
                              180 
                                to 200oF (82 to 93oC)  | 
                           
                           
                            |   Caustic 
                                solution  | 
                              10 
                                to 50 %  | 
                              Ambient  | 
                           
                           
                            |   Hypochlorite  | 
                              5 
                                to 15 %  | 
                              70 
                                to 200oF (21 to 93oC)  | 
                           
                         
                        3) Contactors 
                        Table 7.2 represents various 
                          types of contacting apparatus presently being used in 
                          scrubbing systems throughout the industry. Comments 
                          are given to provide some of the positive and negative 
                          points of each system. Selection of the contactor must 
                          be dependent on specific need or application. 
                        
                           
                            |  
                               CHLORINE CONTACTORS 
                                (TABLE 7.2)  | 
                           
                           
                            |   Type  | 
                              Descriptions  | 
                              Properties  | 
                              Conditions  | 
                           
                           
                            |   Sparger  | 
                              This 
                                device is made by submerging a distribution pipe 
                                below the surface of the neutralizing liquid and 
                                allowing the stream to be scrubbed to bubble through.  | 
                              1. 
                                Very simple, passive and commonly used. 
                                2. Usually batch operation 
                                3. Very economical to build 
                                4. Uses system pressure for contacting  | 
                              1. 
                                High D P 
                                2. Misting may be a problem 
                                3. Performance is typically predicted by experience 
                                or test  | 
                           
                           
                            |   Spray 
                                Tower  | 
                              This 
                                device is usually of counter flow design with 
                                multiple layers of nozzles with overlapping spray 
                                patterns of neutralizing solution.  | 
                              1. 
                                Low D P 
                                2. Simple design 
                                3. Most economical tower design  | 
                              1. 
                                Limited contacting stages 
                                2. Nozzle pluggage possible 
                                3. Performance is typically predicted by experience 
                                or test  | 
                           
                           
                            |   Packed 
                                Tower  | 
                              This 
                                device is usually of counter flow design with 
                                bottom gas entry into open area under packed section. 
                                Liquid enters at top of packed section in liquid 
                                distribution trays or pipes, liquid flows down 
                                through the packed section creating multi stage 
                                contacting.  | 
                              1. 
                                High contacting surface - multi-stage contacting 
                                2. Moderate D P 
                                3. Performance readily predicted 
                                4. operates over a wide range of gas flow  | 
                              1. 
                                Pluggage of packing possible 
                                2. Complete wetting of packing is necessary for 
                                proper tower performance  | 
                           
                           
                            |   Tray 
                                Tower  | 
                              This 
                                device is usually of counter flow design with 
                                gas entering at the bottom of the column with 
                                scrubbing liquid entering on the top tray. Gas 
                                bubbles through the liquid on each tray creating 
                                a multistage neutralization column  | 
                              1. 
                                Moderate to high D 
                                P 
                                2. Multi-stage contacting 
                                3. Performance readily predicted  | 
                              1. 
                                Tray pluggage possible 
                                2. Most expensive tower to build 
                                3. Trays must be filled for proper performance  | 
                           
                           
                            |   Venturi 
                                scrubber  | 
                              This 
                                device uses a high pressure liquid stream to create 
                                as vacuum using an ejector. As the high pressure 
                                liquid passes through the throat of the venturi 
                                intimate contacting occurs.  | 
                              1. 
                                Eliminates the need for gas mover 
                                2. Pre-engineered units are available  | 
                              1. 
                                Number of transfer units limited in a single stage 
                                2. Efficiency determined only by testing 
                                3. Less effective for dilute chlorine stream  | 
                           
                         
                        To be continued. 
                          Please press the next button....  |